The Magna Carta (Great Charter), 1297 Parliament House, Canberra | Origins of the 1215 Magna Carta
King John exploited and abused the traditional sources of revenue. Desperate for money to wage wars in defence of his estates, John demanded unprecedented amounts in ‘scutage’, or money from his tenants in lieu of providing knights for the king’s service. He was intemperate and at times cruel in his manner of enforcing his rights from his land-holders and from the church, and unjust in his treatment of people at all levels. There was no redress against the absolute power of the king.
Barons who resisted paying the excessive levies had their lands confiscated and members of their families taken as hostages. By 1215 rebel barons outnumbered those loyal to John. They united and marched on London from the north and captured the Tower of London on 17 May 1215.
I have proven false allegations of DV, proven corruption in Queensland Government, have court orders for my 5yo to see me every week, I have been in family corrupt court for 5 years, legal aid Queensland has blocked contact for over 2 years. I am still waiting new orders from August 2014 trial.
Voting LNP ALP Axis of Evil is Voting for child Abuse from Trafficking
Would be good if you will write to your state and federal members as this is their job to do my son has been denied his inalienable rights and free liberties by corruption in our government to see and be with us.
Breaches of law FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 – SECT 4AB (i) preventing the family member from making or keeping connections with his or her family, friends or culture;
We need to get Tough on public service crime and corruption, we are very much under attack, we need leadership.
My Surfers Paradise State and Fed LNP reps got me on charges s474.17 a fed indictment from an email on my sons 5th birthday, in defense of my young son, I’m getting a summary trial, no legal aid, no legal rep, no jury, 3 years prison.
CRIMES ACT 1914 – SECT 4G
Indictable offences
Offences against a law of the Commonwealth punishable by imprisonment for a period exceeding 12 months are indictable offences, unless the contrary intention appears.
CRIMINAL CODE ACT 1995 –
10.4 Self-defence
(1) A person is not criminally responsible for an offence if he or she carries out the conduct constituting the offence in self-defence.
Forced to file a writs of habeas corpus in federal magistrates court for COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT – SECT 80
Trial by jury
The trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the Commonwealth
, and subsequent private prosecution of systemic corruption and child abuse under the Australian family law act.
The Parliament and government are linked in the relationship known as ‘responsible government’, which was described earlier. For this reason, we consider them together. These are powerful institutions, which control the law-making process.
Potentially, they protect rights in two ways: positively, by passing laws to protect rights that are not currently protected and negatively, by restraining themselves from making laws to infringe rights that are recognized by the common law or international law.
CRIMES ACT 1914 – SECT 28 Interfering with political liberty Any person who, by violence or by threats or intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes with the free exercise or performance, by any other person, of any political right or duty, shall be guilty of an offence.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 3 years.
A person is incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a Member if he or she has been convicted of bribery, undue influence or interference with political liberty, or has been found by the Court of Disputed Returns to have committed or attempted to commit bribery or undue influence when a candidate, disqualification being for two years from the date of the conviction or finding..
Unfortunately it will get worse, our public services attract antisocial types, sociopaths, psychopaths, pedophiles, narcissus like flies. Question is how do we fix it, given our public service is working against us.
We need to organise real people to take up parliamentary seats. candidates, independents or otherwise.
I notice in the UK an anti-feminist party has been formed. It’s what we need here. Every power-crazed zealot is hiding behind women’s skirts to usurp more and more power and it’s reached the stage where men are now artbitrarily jailed in sham courts on trumped up charges, have their children kidnapped and assets looted by bureaucratic flunkeys. Not sure how long this can endure before civil war errupts. Good luck with your thing.
So true, our public services are so psychopath corrupted now, one of our guys just got out of jail, 8 months for telling the truth, no sh#t.
Interesting. Election soon. Where do you stand on allowing us the right to PREPARE for self defence? And where do you stand re: gun laws?
Respectfully, Ian Rabig.
We have every right to defend our selves, our family and friends, We are seriously under attack by our own public employees now.
who resisted paying the excessive levies had their lands confiscated and members of their families taken as hostages. By 1215 rebel barons outnumbered those loyal to John. They united and marched on London from the north and captured the Tower of London on 17 May 1215.
Weakened by a major defeat against the French at Bouvines in July 1214, and disagreements with the Pope, John agreed to negotiate, using Archbishop Stephen Langton as an intermediary. In drawing up a list of demands, the barons looked to earlier times, when kings granted ‘ancient liberties’ in the form of agreements to limitations of their arbitrary powers.
On a meadow at Runnymede, between the king’s court at Windsor and the barons’ camp at Staines, during a week in mid June of 1215, the barons and the king met and agreed to terms which were recorded as a charter of liberties, later known as Magna Carta. The barons pledged fealty to the king, and the king swore that he and his heirs would abide by the conditions of the Charter, ‘in all things and places forever’.
http://www.magnacarta.senate.gov.au/index.php/origins/
10.4 Self-defence
CRIMINAL CODE ACT 1995 – SCHEDULE The Criminal Code
Section 3
Chapter 1 — Codification
Division 1
10.4 Self-defence
(1) A person is not criminally responsible for an offence if he or she carries out the conduct constituting the offence in self-defence.
(2) A person carries out conduct in self-defence if and only if he or she believes the conduct is necessary:
(a) to defend himself or herself or another person; or
(b) to prevent or terminate the unlawful imprisonment of himself or herself or another person; or
http://fathersaustralia.com/study-law-courses-online-australia/10-4-self-defence/
How do you think royal families get to the top of the food chain, a hold on so much land and wealth? Free speech in Australia is non-existent, we do have implied freedom of political communication’ that is to speak freely of anything pertaining to our governance, the running of the government, particularly including judges and courts, that is essential to liberty from tyranny, in reality we the people are the government, what has become known as ‘the government’ are our employee’s.
Thing is we are being controlled, manipulated and ruled by sociopaths and psychopaths, I have tried and test these a number of judges, when it comes down to it they lie and cheat to get the outcome they want, is why lawyers do, one thing for sure there not interested in truth or justice or honor.
“Due to their brains and skill at manipulating people, they usually have college degrees and often hold down good jobs. They frequently have spouses and kids — with nobody suspecting a thing. And, as mentioned, crimes by psychopaths are well-planned, making capture difficult.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-siciliano/what-is-a-sociopath_b_5877160.html
“The basic assumption that the truth lies between the testimony of the two sides always shifts the advantage to the lying side and away from the side telling the truth. Under most circumstances, this shift put together with the fact that the truth is going to also be twisted in such a way as to bring detriment to the innocent person, results in the advantage always resting in the hands of liars – psychopaths. Even the simple act of giving testimony under oath is useless. If a person is a liar, swearing an oath means nothing to that person. However, swearing an oath acts strongly on a serious, truthful witness. Again, the advantage is placed on the side of the liar. [Robert Canup] ”
http://www.cassiopaea.com/cassiopaea/psychopath.htm