Parliament of Australia
House of Representatives
Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs
Thursday, July 03, 2014
Dear Members,
50/50 shared care is the civilised standard.
I write to you with deep sincerity and concern, at as to the health and wellbeing of children in these circumstances.
- linkages between Family Court decisions and Child Support’s policies and processes; and
- how the scheme could provide better outcomes for high conflict families.
“Family Court decisions” Oppression and Tyranny
From my 4 year experience with the Australian Family court judiciaries and associated bureaucracies, there is absolutely no rule of law or accountability, only an absolute maniacal sociopathic narcisstic lust for power and money.
I am witness to cronyism, corruption, abuse, misconduct and misbehaviour from Brisbane family court judges oldest and newest, reputably the most corrupt judiciary in Australia.
Corrupt ICL lawyers, family report writers, pseudo experts and practitioners, this is a dysfunctional criminally corrupt secret industry kept a corrupt secret with 121 FLA, ICL Child Lawyer and consultant’s purger to obstruct pervert and defeat justice.
In secret courts with NO juries, Our Children, our families, our culture, our future under attack from within, organised crime, graft, profiting from crime and judicial corruption ambush psychological war against Australian Children and Families, with destructive and lethal consequences’.
It is an antisocial psyche war on children and families aimed at defeating justice for power and profit, thousands of Australian families are victimised, trapped every year.
Until there is true public accountability of judiciaries, bureaucracies and associate you are ‘pissing against the wind’
WE MUST CHANGE THIS FOR OUR CHILDREN AND NATIONAL BEST INTEREST, ONLY PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY WORKS, DEMOCRACY AND JURIES.
50/50 shared care is the civilised standard.
If for no good reason one parent works against 50/50 it could be said they are being dysfunctional, antisocial and should be assessed for personality disorder APD NPD.
Stop graft, exploitation and abuse in the child trafficking industry.
- Repeal rescind revoke and annul 121. Family Law Act (FLA) their iron curtain secret gag law stopping communication with the Australian public, covering corruption exploitation and abuse.
- Open the court objective truth, juries on appeals, not subjective bigoted parasitic judiciaries.
- Abolish legal aid. Stop funding corrupt illicit sex discrimination. Legal Aid should be nothing more than a self help webpage, not slush funds for politically violent corrupt law firms.
- Hold public employees to account, to the public, by the public, for the public.
Sincerely
Fathers Australia formally Fathers Union of Australia.
The Committee will inquire and report on the following:
- methods used by Child Support to collect payments in arrears and manage overpayments;
- whether the child support system is flexible enough to accommodate the changing circumstances of families;
- the alignment of the child support and family assistance frameworks;
- linkages between Family Court decisions and Child Support’s policies and processes; and
- how the scheme could provide better outcomes for high conflict families.
As part of this inquiry, the Committee has a particular interest in:
- assessing the methodology for calculating payments and the adequacy of current compliance and enforcement powers for the management of child support payments;
- the effectiveness of mediation and counselling arrangements as part of family assistance frameworks; and
- ensuring that children in high conflict families are best provided for under the child support scheme.
In carrying out this review, the Committee should assess whether any problems experienced by payers or payees of child support impact on the majority of parents and other carers involved in the system, or a minority, and make recommendations accordingly (e.g. there may be a case for specialised processes and supports for some parents meeting certain criteria).
Committee, SPLAChildSupport (REPS)
Thank you for your submission to the Parliamentary Inquiry into the Child Support Program. The Committee has considered your submission,and hasdecided to publish it online.
All accepted submissions to Parliamentary inquiries have the protection of parliamentary privilege. Publication of your submission includes it being loaded onto the internet (with your signature and/or contact details removed) and being available to other interested parties including the media.
Your name may have been withheld from the published version of your submission either at your request or at the discretion of the Committee. If you would like to know what number your submission is, please contact the Secretariat.
If your contribution contains confidential material and you have concerns about it being published, please email the secretariat as soon as possible at childsupport.reps@aph.gov.au.
Individuals are also encouraged to complete the questionnaire. All responses to the questionnaire will be provided directly to the Committee.
If you have any questions regarding your submission or the inquiry, please contact the Committee Secretariat.
Parliamentary inquiry into the Child Support Program
(02) 6277 2223 | www.aph.gov.au/ChildSupport | PO Box 6021 Parliament House ACT 2600
Parliament of Australia House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs
Saturday, July 19, 2014
Dear Members, As I have had nil response from my previous email.
I must insist that the committee publish my submission on indictment have been implied by the High Court from these parts of the Constitution. It is established that the Constitution protects ‘freedom of political communication’ or, in other words, the right of Australians to communicate freely with each other and with their elected representatives about political and public affairs.
The Parliament and government are linked in the relationship known as ‘responsible government’, which was described earlier. For this reason, we consider them together. These are powerful institutions, which control the law-making process.
Potentially, they protect rights in two ways: positively, by passing laws to protect rights that are not currently protected and negatively, by restraining themselves from making laws to infringe rights that are recognized by the common law or international law.
- CRIMES ACT 1914 – SECT 28 Interfering with political liberty Any person who, by violence or by threats or intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes with the free exercise or performance, by any other person, of any political right or duty, shall be guilty of an offence.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 3 years.
A person is incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a Member if he or she has been convicted of bribery, undue influence or interference with political liberty, or has been found by the Court of Disputed Returns to have committed or attempted to commit bribery or undue influence when a candidate, disqualification being for two years from the date of the conviction or finding.
I wait your compliance.
Steven C Wickenden
Fathers Australia, formally Fathers Union of Australia, formally fathers Australia.
http://fathersunionaustralia.com/wp
Committee, SPLAChildSupport (REPS)
Dear Mr Wickenden,
Your submission has been published online. It is submission n.90, and is available at this page: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Social_Policy_and_Legal_Affairs/Child_Support_Program/Submissions
Regards,
Thomas
Inquiry Secretary
Parliamentary inquiry into the Child Support Program
(02) 6277 2223 | www.aph.gov.au/ChildSupport | PO Box 6021 Parliament House ACT 2600
