NATO SECURITY SPECIALIST Speaks Out on the UK Stealing Children for Profit

March 11, 2013

Sabine Kurjo McNeillBelgium, Day of Action, Day of Action 28 March 2013, Secret Family Courts, Social Services, United KingdomAfghan National Army, Afghanistan, Belgium, Children Act 1989, Children Youth and Family, Convention on the Rights of the Child, Government, Human rights, International Security Assistance Force, NATO, Nigel Cooper, Uniform, United States, United States Armed ForcesLeave a comment

Normally, we refer to the following legal frameworks

• Children Act 1989
• European Convention on on Human Rights
• UN Convention on the Rights of a Child.

The Belgian judgement that Nigel Cooper obtained is here (with my emphasis and highlights added) and adds

• the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.

Related articles

• BANNED from the UK: NATO Security Consultant because the “UK has been caught red handed stealing children” (punishmentwithoutcrime.wordpress.com)

Armies of family court judiciaries lawyers and their cohorts are snatching and exploiting childern on an industrial scale never seem before.

Then gloating on destroying thier lives, killing 2, 3 people and up every day here in Australia alone.

Fathers Union of Australia http://fathersaustralia.com/2013/03/12/stealing-children/

Banned from seeing his baby son, desperate father Nathan Ellem scaled Brisbane’s Storey Bridge in protest.

Now on A Current Affair, he justifies his drastic actions.

If you or anyone you know is in emotional distress, please contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or www.lifeline.org.au.

http://aca.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8602633

We all need one of these … Canadian Registry for Public Accountability http://www.crpa.ca/ … Steve

Posted by Donald Tenn (cause leader)

Foot note …

Members now All (2,088) |

Click here … Journal of Family Studies

The Journal of Family Studies is a peer reviewed international journal under the Editorship of Adjunct Professor Lawrie Moloney, School of Public Health, LaTrobe University; Australian Institute of Family Studies;  and co-director of Children in Focus.  The focus of the Journal of Family Studies is on the wellbeing of children in families in the process of change.

The primary purpose of the Journal of Family Studies is to bring together the best research and practices available to support children and families though periods of transition, especially when those periods are associated with high levels of conflict. Papers that focus on the impact of change and transitional situations on children, either directly or via the impact on parents or close family members, dispute resolution and the broad social issues reflected in family law are encouraged.

Journal of Family Studies publishes two regular issues of feature research articles and one topic-based special issue per annum – in 2011:

• Mediating Family Disputes (17/3 Call for Papers, Deadline May 2011)

Special issues are also released as books with their own ISBN for use as course readers or separate sale to non-subscribers. Evaluation copies of all special issues are available to Course Coordinators from the publisher at: subscriptions@e-contentmanagement.com.

• Please send proposals for special issues initially to Journal of Family Studies‘ Editor,Lawrie Moloney
• Third parties may advertise or insert flyers in the journal, including reciprocal promotions; please address enquiries to info@e-contentmanagement.com.
• Discounted individual and NGO/non-profit subscription rates are available. All Family Relationship Centres receive a non-profit organisation discount.

Our kids are being exploited by courts and lawyer, please stop this corruption exploitation and abuse … lead us please … http://aca.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8567595

Dear Attorney General and members of government,

Like so many others, I applaud the recent announcement of a Royal Commission into child abuse. We have all heard horrific stories and know people who have suffered sexual abuse at the hands of religious organisations and state institutions. Sadly, vulnerable children can also suffer abuse at the hands of their own parents.

What I find particularly appalling is the prevalence of false child abuse allegations being raised simply to gain advantage in Family Court proceedings. It is an absolute insult to anybody who has suffered real abuse, yet such deliberate and malicious perjury goes unpunished. In family law circles, such allegations are commonly referred to as the ‘magic bullet’ for resolving custody battles over children. Whoever makes an abuse allegation against the other parent first, typically wins custody of the children.

The courts operate focussing on the ‘best interests of the child’, so where there may be any kind of threat, then there is a presumption of guilt against the accused parent, and they are withdrawn from having contact with their own children. This of course gives full care of the child to the parent telling the lies and rewards them for doing so. For the alienated parent, the allegation may as well be a conviction.

This year, your government passed a bill which removed all penalties for making false allegations in the Family Court. It also broadened the definition of ‘domestic violence’ to be so vague that almost anything can now fit the criteria of ‘domestic violence’.

For alienated parents who don’t just give up or take their own life in despair, it can then take up to two years just to have the matter heard by the court, before they even have a chance to defend the allegation. Two years of separation from your children, just like that. The child loses a loving parent, just like that. This is called parental alienation, and it is in itself a form of child abuse, but one that is not recognised by the courts.

Family Court outcomes need to be included in the terms of reference of this Royal Commission into child abuse, because the court itself has no records of, or interest in, the outcomes of decisions it makes in secret, often handing care of vulnerable children into the hands of the alienators and abusers. Hardly in the ‘best interests of the child’. Devastated and dispossessed parents fall by the wayside as faceless, nameless victims of the secret Family Court process, many becoming homeless and destitute as part of associated property settlements and child support claims.

What is urgently needed in this country is dramatic reform in family law, a whole new approach. After all, courts are for criminals, not families.

Sincerely,

Andrew Gough

PO Box 1701

Lismore NSW 2480

Petition link … Demand the Royal Commission have wide ranging terms of reference: Investigate child abuse in every public and private institution

Annaleise Grace Harris-Edwards

 Kidnapped from a daycare centre in Sydney by Bronwyn Edwards, of Castle Hill, who was driving  a red-pink Hyundai Excel when she was last seen with the girl:

  They are believed to be in the Gold Coast, Brisbane or Toowoomba areas.

 Bronwyn Edwards is described as being in her mid 50′s, Caucasian and of average build with dark brown hair. Annaleise is described as Caucasian and petite with shoulder length light brown hair, blue eyes and a gap between her front upper teeth.

 Anyone with any information about the whereabouts of

Bronwyn Edwards or Annaleise should contact

 Crimestoppers

on

1800 333 000

ORGINAL POST Family Court Seeks Help To Locate Abducted 4 y/o Girl 

Click here Petitioning Demand the Royal Commission have wide ranging terms of reference

This petition will be delivered to:

Demand the Royal Commission have wide ranging terms of reference

Demand the Royal Commission have wide ranging terms of reference: Investigate child abuse in every public and private institution

Petition by

TJ Norton

Jimboomba, Australia